PUBLICATIONS

More than 50 papers and technical articles on application of statistical methods on sensory/consumer, etc fields were published. The followings are the papers published in recent years.

Bi, J. 2011. Invited Review: A review of statistical methods for determination of relative importance of correlated predictors and identification of drivers of consumer liking. Journal of Sensory Studies. In press.

Bi, J. 2011. Bayesian approach to sensory preference, difference, and equivalence tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 26: 383-399.

Bi, J. and Chung, J. 2011. Identification of drivers of overall liking -- Determination of relative importances of regressor variables. Journal of Sensory Studies 26: 245-254.

Bi, J. 2011. Similarity tests using forced-choice methods in terms of Thurstonian discriminal distance, . Journal of Sensory Studies 26: 151-157.

Bi. J., Lee, H-S., and O'Mahony, M. 2010. d' and variance of d' for four-alternative forced choice (4-AFC). Journal of Sensory Studies 25: 740-750.

Bi, J. 2010. Using the benchmark dose (BMD) methodology to determine an appropriate reduction of certain ingredients in food products. Journal of Food Science 75 (1): R9-16.

Bi, J. 2010. Comments on D.M. Ennis’ Presentation on Equivalence Testing. Food Quality and Preference 21: 259-260.

Bi, J. 2009. Computer-intensive methods for sensory data analysis, exemplified by Durbin's rank test. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 195-202.

Gacula, M., Singh, J., Bi, J.,and Altan, S. 2008. Statistical Methods in Food and Consumer Research. 2nd Edition. Elsevier.

Bi, J. 2008. Reply to letter to the Editor from D.M. Ennis. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 344-346.

Bi, J. and O'Mahony, M. 2007. Updated and extended table for testing the significance of the R-index. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22, 713-720 .

Bi, J. 2007. Replicated similarity testing using paired comparison method. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22 (2), 176-186.

Bi, J. 2007. Similarity testing using paired comparison method. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 500-507.

Bi, J. 2006. Statistical analyses for R-index. Journal of Sensory Studies 21 (6): 584-600.

Bi, J. 2007. Bayesian analysis for proportion with an independent background effect. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 60, 71-83.

Bi, J. 2005. Sensory Discrimination Tests and Measurements: Statistical Principles, Procedures and Tables. Blackwell Publishing.

Bi, J. 2005. Commentary of the Moskowitz's paper: “Thoughts on subjective measurement, sensory metrics, and usefulness of outcomes”. Journal of Sensory Studies, 20, 367-372.

Bi, J. 2005. Estimating population or group sensitivity and its precision from a set of individual d’. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 55-63.

Bi, J. 2005. Similarity testing in sensory and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference. 16 (8), 139-149.

Bi, J. 2003. Agreement and reliability assessments for performance of sensory discriptive panel. Journal of Sensory Studies, 18 (1), 61-76.

Bi, J. 2003. Difficulties and a way out--A Bayesian approach for sensory difference and preference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 18 (1), 1-18.

Bi, J. 2002. Statistical models for the Degree of Difference method. Food Quality and Preference. 13 (1), 31-37.

Bi, J. 2002. Variance of d' for the same-different method. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 37-45.

Bi, J. 2002. Comparison of correlated proportions in replicated product test. Journal of Sensory Studies 17 (1), 105-114.

Bi, J. 2001. The double discrimination methods. Food Quality and Preference. 12 (8), 507-513.

Bi, J. and Ennis, D.M. 2001. The power of the A-not-A method. Journal of Sensory Studies. 16 (4) 343-359.

Bi, J. and Ennis, D.M. 2001. Exact beta-binomial tables for small experiments. Journal of Sensory Studies. 16 (3), 319-325.

Bi, J. and Ennis, D.M. 2001. Statistical models for the A-not A method. Journal of Sensory Studies. 16 (2), 215-237.

Ennis, D.M. and Bi, J. 2000. Multivariate quality control with applications to sensory data. Journal of Food Quality, 23 (6), 541-552.

Bi, J., Templeton-Janick, L., Ennis, J.M. and Ennis, D.M. 2000. Replicated difference and preference tests: How to account for inter-trial variation. Food Quality and Preference, 11 (4), 269-273.

Bi, J. and Ennis, D.M. 1999. Beta-binomial tables for replicated difference and preference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 14, 347-369.

Ennis, D.M. and Bi, J. 1999. The Dirichlet-multinomial model: Accounting for inter-trial variations in replicated ratings. Journal of Sensory Studies, 14, 321-345.

Bi, J. and Ennis, D.M. 1999. The power of sensory discrimination methods used in replicated difference and preference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 14, 289-302.

Ennis, D.M. and Bi, J. 1998. The beta-binomial model: Accounting for inter-trial variation in replicated difference and preference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 389-412.

Bi, J. and Ennis, D.M. 1998. A Thurstonian variant of the beta-binomial model for replicated difference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 461-466.

Bi, J., and Ennis, D.M. 1998. Sensory thresholds: Concepts and methods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 133-148.

Bi, J., Ennis, D.M. and O’Mahony, M. 1997. How to estimate and use the variance of d' from difference tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 12, 87-104.

Bi. J. and O'Mahony, M. 1995. Table for testing the significance of the R-index. Journal of Sensory Studies, 10, 341-347.

Bi, J. 1995. Nonparametric models for discrimination methods and sensitivity analysis for triads. Journal of Sensory Studies, 10, 325-340.